...born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.
With “friends” like Brown, who needs Arabs?: Melanie Phillips laces into British P.M. Gordon Brown for his speech to the Knesset yesterday. In it, he shed lots of crocodile tears over the Jews’ tragic history, but then, wasting no time, segued right into Mahmoud Abbas’s talking points:
...Brown, the lifelong ‘friend’ of Israel, has thus told Israel that it must accept the agenda of its mortal enemies: an agenda designed to destroy it. As far as I can see, he has uttered not one word of reprimand to the Palestinians for their unending war of annihilation against Israel. He did not tell them that they have no right to expect anything at all unless they renounce their goal of destroying the Jewish state. He did not tell them that their ‘historic’ claim to any part of the land is based on a historic and legal lie, and that Israel is fully justified under international law to hold onto it against their unending aggression. He did not tell them that their misery is entirely of their own making and would end the instant they stopped trying to destroy Israel. He did not tell them any of these factual and moral truths. Instead, he parroted to the beleaguered Israelis in their own Parliament the disgusting moral inversion of Arab propaganda which turns Israel into the barrier to peace and the Palestinians into the seekers of justice.
He thus told Israel it must return to the ‘1967 borders’ – which are in fact the 1948 cease-fire lines and referred to in Israel as the ‘Auschwitz borders’ because they are totally indefensible. He told it that it must freeze and withdraw from settlements – thus endorsing the Arab agenda of ethnic cleansing which requires not one Jew to be living in a future state of Palestine. He told it that Jerusalem must be the capital of both Israel and Palestine – despite the fact that the Arab claim to Jerusalem is entirely one of conquest; despite the fact that Israeli Jerusalem would be under bombardment from enemies living just a few streets away; and despite the fact that it would mean a return to the desecration of Jewish and Christian holy sites in east Jerusalem that was such a dreadful feature of its previous occupation by Jordanian Arabs.
And although the published text of his speech does not use the explosive term ‘right of return’ which appears in Ben Brogan’s blog and which would mean the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state, he accepts that the Palestinian ‘refugees’ need a ‘just settlement’ – regardless of the fact that the descendants of no other displaced people are judged by the world to have ‘rights’ as refugees, including the 800,000 Jews who were ethnically cleansed from Arab lands after 1948; regardless of the fact that most of the Palestinian Arabs’ ancestors only arrived in Palestine on the back of the Jewish immigration in the early 20th century; and regardless of the fact that in no other conflict in the history of this planet have those who have tried to wipe out a country been deemed worthy of reward and that the country that is the victim of their violent aggression been expected to accommodate them – even while it is still fending off their attacks.
This moral deformity is not just confined to Arab propaganda but is the signature belief of the left. Since the left believes that anyone who disagrees with it is ‘the right’, it dismisses the cause of truth, justice and morality in the Middle East as merely the thinking of ‘the right’ and thus not even worthy of consideration. That was indeed, after the unease displayed in the Knesset at Brown’s speech, the response by Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert -- a man who has done more to weaken Israel, both morally and strategically, and embolden and strengthen its enemies than any politician since the restoration of the State of Israel in 1948. It is also – tragically -- the view of many prominent Jews on the left in Britain and America. It is rooted in the left’s disdain for – or sheer incomprehension of – moral judgments, and their replacement by moral relativism and inversion camouflaged by self-righteous sentimentality. It is a view which actively strengthens the enemies of civilisation and makes continued violence and war absolutely inevitable. With his Knesset speech, Gordon Brown has shown himself to be just another creature of the morally bankrupted left, and what remained of his reputation as the rock of Caledonian granite now lies crumbled in the desert dust.
Brown's a faux-friend. Or a foe-friend. Take your pick.

Mo'nonymous on “Interfaith di...
Mo'nonymous on Way to go, Jews!: As...
Mo'nonymous on Buddhists? Wic...
scaramouche on Buddhists? Wic...
scaramouche on Way to go, Jews!: As...
Mo'nonymous on Way to go, Jews!: As...
Mo'nonymous on Buddhists? Wic...
scaramouche on Buddhists? Wic...
Mo'nonymous on Buddhists? Wic...
scaramouche on Jen’s "br...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
Cynical Nation
daily blitz
Damian Penny
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
little green footballs
Marlowe's Shade
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
Tim Blair
VDH
today
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times