Anonymous on Ducking into the ...
Anonymous on George Orwell ...
Anonymous on A Grand ...
Anonymous on Ducking into the ...
Anonymous on Canadian Arabs ...
Anonymous on Kind of ...
Anonymous on A guide for the ...
Anonymous on Zerb sounds the ...
Anonymous on A guide for the ...
scaramouche on Zerb sounds the ...
Belmont Club
Blazing Cat Fur
butterflies and wheels
City Journal
conservativeinthecloset
Cynical Nation
daily blitz
Daniel Pipes
David Warren
Dhimmi Watch
Five Feet of Fury
Flaggman's Canada
Free Mark Steyn
Front Page Magazine
Honest Reporting Canada
Israel Pundit
israelinsider
israpundit
Jerusalem Post
Martin Kramer
Media Backspin
Melanie Phillips
Real Clear Politics
stopahmadinejad
The American Thinker
The Optimistic Conservative
Tim Blair
VDH
today
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
visited *loading* times
Pearl the cherry-picker: In her authoritative whitewash of Canada’s “human rights” industry in the current issue of Maisonneuve magazine, “human rights” diva Pearl Eliadis quotes Mark Steyn as referring to Muslims as “sheep-shaggers”. That, she suggests, is merely one of the many, many “dangerous” utterances which prompted the Hosiery Three to launch complaints against Maclean’s Magazine with three of the nation’s “human rights” bodies. In my post about Pearl’s article, I commented that, if indeed Mark had written such a thing, I was certain it had been “cherry-picked”—i.e. taken out of context (like so many of those Meccan-era passages—“there’s no compulsion in religion” and the rest—that those who wish us to have only warm ‘n fuzzy feelings toward Islam often pluck, willy-nilly, from the Koran). Turns out I was right. Here’s the sheep-shagging comment in context--a Steyn column about Oriana Fallaci--which Pearl plucked like a ripe, "Islamophobic" cherry (I’ve taken the liberty of bolding the pertinent ovine passages):
…Signora [Oriana] Fallaci then moves on to the livelier examples of contemporary Islam -- for example, Ayatollah Khomeini's "Blue Book" and its helpful advice on romantic matters: "If a man marries a minor who has reached the age of nine and if during the defloration he immediately breaks the hymen, he cannot enjoy her any longer." I'll say. I know it always ruins my evening. Also: "A man who has had sexual relations with an animal, such as a sheep, may not eat its meat. He would commit sin." Indeed. A quiet cigarette afterwards as you listen to your favourite Johnny Mathis LP and then a promise to call her next week and swing by the pasture is by far the best way. It may also be a sin to roast your nine-year-old wife, but the Ayatollah's not clear on that.
Kinky as this is, it has nothing on Fallaci's next circle of cultural diversity -- the weirdly masochistic pleasure European leaders get out of talking themselves down and talking Islam up. Beginning with the German foreign minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher at the 1983 Hamburg Symposium for the Euro-Arab Dialogue, Signora Fallaci rounds up a quarter-century's worth of westerners who've insisted that everything you know was invented by Islam: paper, medicine, sherbet, artichokes, on and on and on . . .
"Always clever, the Muslims. Always at the top. Always ingenious. In philosophy, in mathematics, in gastronomy, in literature, in architecture, in medicine, in music, in law, in hydraulics, in cooking. And always stupid, we westerners. Always inadequate, always inferior. Therefore obliged to thank some son of Allah who preceded us. Who enlightened us. Who acted as a schoolteacher guiding dim-witted pupils."
This, it seems to me, is the most valuable contribution of Oriana Fallaci's work. I enjoy the don't-eat-your-sexual-partner stuff as much as the next infidel, but the challenge presented by Islam is not that the cities of the Western world will be filling up with sheep-shaggers.
So it appears that it was that late, great holy rollah, Khomeini, who brought up the subject of sheep-shtupping and whether or not, having had one’s way with lambikins, it was appropriate to then ingest him/her for lunch. The idea was not, as Pearl Eliadis would have you believe, something that suddenly popped into Steyn’s mind, “flagrantly Islamophobic” though she and the sockies may consider that mind to be. Steyn was merely riffing (and goofing) on the Ayatollah. In which case, maybe the Socky triad should consider hauling the late Ayatollah’s mouldering carcass in front of the HRCs, since, clearly, he’s the one who had the "dangerous" ideas.
Update: Mark Steyn comments on Pearl's cherry-picking, and on the way the humourless "human rights" types have set themselves up as the arbiters of comedy/satire/joking in the Great White North. (Wasn't it the perceptive Ayatollah Khomeini who once noted "there's no fun in Canada"? How right he was!)
Update: Further to Mark's comments, it occurs to me that Canadians are notoriously leery about putting weapons in the hands of regular folks--the reason we have gun-control and, now it seems, joke-control.
Update: Let's give credit where it's due. At least the Ayatolloh cleared up the vexacious matter of whether it's possible to have one's sheep and eat it, too.

Update: Exercising tremendous self-restraint, I have decided not to do a parody of a Marvin Gaye classic, the chorus of which would have gone "I heard it through the grapevine/That your concubine is ovine."
You're welcome.
